mahdi hosaini
Abstract
Jewish fundamentalism, as a kind of a variety of religious fundamentalism, has its own specifics, while having similarities to other forms of fundamentalism. Different interpretations of religious and historical sources have led to the formation of various forms of Jewish fundamentalism, which, if we ...
Read More
Jewish fundamentalism, as a kind of a variety of religious fundamentalism, has its own specifics, while having similarities to other forms of fundamentalism. Different interpretations of religious and historical sources have led to the formation of various forms of Jewish fundamentalism, which, if we want to provide an indicator for categorizing these species, is the best indicator of the "exile" or "return" principle. From the perspective of the fundamentalists that we are in exile or the time of return, we have our own rules and requirements, and on this basis we can mention three fundamental types of fundamentalism: passive fundamentalism, pragmatic fundamentalism, and promised believing fundamentalism. The Jewish fundamentalists, while dividing into different groups, have the same ultimate goals, and the difference between the aforementioned species is a tool, method, and time-space detection. Of course, in addition to the intra-religious components, the alignment or opposition to political movements, the role played by the policies of the Zionist regime, and also the attention to the adoption of pragmatic positions of some of these groups, one can well categorize and why certain positions in different types of fundamentalism Explaining.
Jalil Dara; Mostafa Karami
Volume 4, Issue 14 , December 2015, , Pages 41-69
Abstract
Revolutions are studied from different perspectives and levels, causes oftheir occurrence, consequences, affecting forces and their reflections and soon. The Islamic Revolution of Iran in 1979 and the Egyptian revolution inJanuary 2011 as two major political and social changes, can be studied andcompared ...
Read More
Revolutions are studied from different perspectives and levels, causes oftheir occurrence, consequences, affecting forces and their reflections and soon. The Islamic Revolution of Iran in 1979 and the Egyptian revolution inJanuary 2011 as two major political and social changes, can be studied andcompared from different perspectives and approaches. Especially, in one ofthem that is the Iranian revolution, led to the victory of the Islamic streamand the continuation of a political system, and in the other, the Egyptianrevolution, despite initial successes of the Muslim Brotherhood, and aftertaking power for a year, eventually driven out of power by a military coupwhen public opposition expanded, and after the repression, the MuslimBrotherhood social and political activities were banned and prohibited.Now, the question is how the Islamist movement in Iran and Egypt, led to adifferent results in the revolution and its subsequent events. In response tothis question, the hypothesis is that the role of leadership can be consideredas an effective factor in the movement during and after the revolution
